Home Page

Climate-change believers no more zealous than skeptics about fire mitigation

From a published study by Hannah Brenkert-Smith, James Meldrum and Patricia Champ

       Hannah Brenkert-Smith and James Meldrum are research associates in the Institute of Behavioral Sciences at CU-Boulder. Patricia Champ is employed at the U.S. Forest Service’s Rocky Mountain Research Station.

       People who believe that climate change is increasing the risk of devastating wildfires in Colorado are no more likely to take mitigation actions to protect their property, a new study led by researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder and the U.S. Forest Service has found.
       The study, which was recently published in the journal, “Environmental Hazards,” examined the role that climate-change beliefs play
A crew puts cuttings into a chipper during fire mitigation work, coordinated by Colorado Springs Forestry, which thinned out overgrown brush and trees on the west side of Red Rock Canyon Open Space in December 2013.
Westside Pioneer file photo
in a homeowner's choice to undertake risk-mitigation activities such as installing a fire-resistant roof to reduce the ignitability of their home or thinning surrounding vegetation that could act as a potential fuel source.
       Respondents in the study were placed on a continuum from “believer” to “skeptic,” based on their attitudes about the degree to which climate change affects wildfire risk in Colorado. Although over half of the study respondents agreed that climate change has increased wildfire risk in the state, those respondents were not necessarily more likely to take action on their private property to mitigate potential damage from future blazes.
       The researchers did, however, find a correlation between climate change denial and risk mitigation actions.
       “A small but distinct portion of respondents who reject climate science as a 'hoax' are also the ones who reported doing significantly more risk mitigation activities than other respondents,” said Hannah Brenkert-Smith, a research associate in the Institute of Behavioral Sciences at CU-Boulder and lead author of the study.
       The findings suggest that attitudes and actions related to climate change and risk mitigation are more nuanced than they are often portrayed in the media, and that focusing on locally relevant hazards may be a more useful tool for educating and galvanizing residents in fire-prone areas of Colorado.
       “The conventional wisdom that a belief about climate change is a pre-requisite for mitigating local climate change impacts was not found in this analysis,” said study co-author Patricia Champ of the U.S. Forest Service's Rocky Mountain Research Station. “This was a bit of a surprise.”
       Boulder and Larimer counties of Colorado, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and the Colorado State Forest Service provided funding for the study.

         This report was recently provided as a press release from CU-Boulder Media Relations and U.S. Forest Service Media Relations.

(Posted 10/20/15; Opinion: General)

Would you like to respond to this column? The Westside Pioneer welcomes feedback to "General" items (to appear under this subcategory) at editor@westsidepioneer.com. (Click here for letter-writing criteria.)